Holdings Information
What Roe v. Wade should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision / edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin.
Bibliographic Record Display
-
Title:What Roe v. Wade should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision / edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin.
-
Variant Title:What Roe versus Wade should have said
-
Other Contributors/Collections:Balkin, J. M.
-
Published/Created:New York : New York University Press, ©2005.
-
Holdings
Holdings Record Display
-
Location:LAW LIBRARY (level 3)Where is this?
-
Call Number: KF228.R59 W47 2005 (LC)
-
Number of Items:1
-
Status:c.1 Lost - 10-14-2012
-
Location:LAW LIBRARY (level 3)Where is this?
-
Library of Congress Subjects:Roe, Jane, 1947---Trials, litigation, etc.
Wade, Henry--Trials, litigation, etc.
Abortion--Law and legislation--United States.
Trials (Abortion)--United States.
-
Description:xiii, 288 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
-
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 267-273) and index.
-
ISBN:0814799183 (cloth : alk. paper)
-
Contents:Pt. I. Introduction
Roe v. Wade : an engine of controversy / Jack M. Balkin
Pt. II. Revised opinions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton
Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the court)
Reva B. Siegel (concurring)
Mark Tushnet (concurring)
Anita L. Allen (concurring in the judgment)
Jed Rubenfeld (concurring in the judgment except as to Doe)
Robin West (concurring in the judgment)
Cass R. Sunstein (concurring in the judgment)
Akhil Reed Amar (concurring in Roe, dissenting in Doe)
Jeffrey Rosen (dissenting)
Teresa Stanton Collett (dissenting)
Michael Stokes Paulsen (dissenting).