Holdings Information
Integrating spaces : property law and race / Alfred L. Brophy, Alberto Lopez, Kali N. Murray.
Bibliographic Record Display
-
Title:Integrating spaces : property law and race / Alfred L. Brophy, Alberto Lopez, Kali N. Murray.
-
Author/Creator:Brophy, Alfred L.
-
Other Contributors/Collections:Lopez, Alberto, 1969-
Murray, Kali N., 1975-
-
Published/Created:New York : Aspen Publishers, ©2011.
-
Holdings
Holdings Record Display
-
Location:LAW LIBRARY (level 3)Where is this?
-
Call Number: KF5740 .B76 2011
-
Number of Items:1
-
Status:Available
-
Location:LAW LIBRARY (level 3)Where is this?
-
Library of Congress Subjects:Discrimination in housing--Law and legislation--United States--Cases.
Real property--United States--Cases.
Race discrimination--Law and legislation--United States--Cases.
-
Description:xxiii, 334 p. ; 26 cm.
-
Series:Aspen coursebook series.
-
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
-
ISBN:9780735569973
0735569975
-
Contents:Machine generated contents note: I. RACE IN THE MAKING OF PROPERTY LAW
1. Origins: Possession And Dispossession In Property Law
1.1. Beginning Property
1.2. Dispossession: Ownership of Another Person
Antelope, 23 U.S. 66 (1825)
1.3. Dispossession: Conquest and Native American Property Rights
Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. 543 (1823)
1.4. Dispossession: Of Non-Property and Evictions
1.5. Property Rights and Civil Rights
State v. Shack, 277 A.2d 369 (N.J. 1971)
2. Property Rules And Slavery
2.1. Property Rights in Humans
2.2. Owner's Exercise of Dominion over Enslaved People
State v. Mann, 13 N.C. 263 (1830)
2.3. Emancipation of Enslaved Persons
Hinds v. Brazealle, 3 Miss. 837 (1838)
2.4. Trusts for Emancipation
2.5. Recovery for Being Wrongfully Held in Slavery: Unjust Enrichment
Hickam v. Hickam, 46 Mo. App. 496 (1891)
2.6. Anti-Feudalism
Overbaugh v. Patrie, 8 Barb. 28 (NY Sup. Ct. 1852)
II. RACE AND THE REMAKING OF PROPERTY
3. Racial Regulation Of Public Spaces In The United States
3.1. Introducing the Regulation of Race Through Property: Nuisance and Zoning
3.2. Race Nuisance Cases: The Regulation of Jazz and African-American Churches
Trueheart v. Parker, 257 S.W. 640 (Tex.Civ.App. 1923)
Morison v. Rawlinson, 193 S.C. 25, 7 S.E.2d 635 (S.C. 1940)
3.3. Spite Fence? Race and the Purpose of Fences
Bixby v. Cravens, 156 P. 1184 (Okla. 1916)
3.4. Zoning: Prescribing Uses by Race and Ethnicity
Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917)
4. Discrimination And The Sale Or Occupancy Of Real Property
4.1. Statutory Prohibitions on the Purchase or Lease of Real Property: Alien Land Laws
Alien Land Law Act, Cal. ch. 113 (1913)
Alien Land Law Act, Ariz. ch. 43 (1917)
Oyama v. California, 332 U.S. 633 (1948)
4.2. Racially Restrictive Covenants Pre-Shelley
Parmalee v. Morris, 188 N.W. 330 (Mich. 1922)
Porter v. Johnson, 115 S.W.2d 529 (Mo. Ct. App. 1938)
4.3. Shelley v. Kraemer and the Refusal to Enjoin Violations of Racially Restrictive Covenants
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948)
4.4. Application of Shelley in a Different Context
Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, 60 N.W.2d 110 (Iowa 1953)
Spencer v. Flint Memorial Park Association, 144 N.W.2d 622 (Mich. Ct. App. 1966)
III. RACE AND CONTEMPORARY PROPERTY
5. Redefining Home And Neighborhood: Civil Rights And Its Impact On Property Law
5.1. Section 1982 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866
Jones v. Mayer, 392 U.S. 409 (1968)
5.1.1. Fair Housing Act
Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. [§]3604 (2006)
Whisby-Myers v. Kiekenapp, 293 F. Supp.2d 845 (N.D. Ill. 2003)
Ragin v. Harry Macklowe Real Estate Co., 6 F.3d 898 (2nd Cir. 1993)
5.2. Redefining Neighborhood: Place, Property, and the Law in a Post-Civil Rights Context
5.2.1. Basic Right to Community: The Colonias Experience in Texas
Arturo de la Cruz v. Columbus P. Brown a/k/a C.P. Brown, 109 S.W.3d 73 (Tex. App. 2003)
5.2.2. Environmental Justice: A Right to a Healthy Community?
South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 254 F. Supp.2d 486 (D.C.N.J. 2003)
5.2.3. Drawing Lines: Real Estate Transactions and Neighborhoods
Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. [§]3605 (2006)
McGlawn v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Committee, 891 A.2d 757 (2006)
Community Reinvestment Act, 12 U.S.C. [§]2901 (2006)
M & T Mortgage Corp. v. Foy, 858 N.Y.S.2d 567 (2008)
5.2.4. Takings and Urban Design: A Right to Your Community?
6. Contemporary Common Law Property
6.1. First Possession and Ownership
Great Property Cases: Johnson v. M'Intosh and the South Dakota Fossil Cases, Dana G. Jim, 46 St. Louis L.J. 791 (2002)
Black Hills Institute of Geological Research v. South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, 12 F.3d 737 (8th Cir. 1993)
6.2. Law of Gifts
United Daughters of the Confederacy v. Vanderbilt University, 174 S.W.3d 98 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005)
6.3. Adverse Possession
Nome 2000 v. Fagerstrom, 799 P.2d 304 (Alaska 1990)
East 13th Street Homesteaders' Coalition v. Lower East Side Coalition Housing Development, 230 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
6.4. Estates and Future Interests
Hermitage Methodist Homes of Virginia v. The Miller School of Albemarle County, Seven Hills School Inc., and Dominion Trust Co. 387 S.E. 2d 740 (Va. 1990)
6.5. Concurrent Ownership
-Partition
Chuck v. Gomes, 532 P.2d 657 (Haw. 1975)
From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: Undermining Black Landownership, Political Independence, and Community Through Partition Sales of Tenancies in Common, Thomas W. Mitchell, 95 Nw. U. L. Rev. 505 (2001)
McNeely v. Bone, 698 S.W.2d 512 (Ark. 1985)
6.6. Landlord-Tenant Relations
Chapman v. Silber, 97 N.Y.2d 9 (2001)
6.7. Easements
Chicana/Chicano Land Tenure in the Agrarian Domain: On the Edge of a "Naked Knife," Guadalupe T. Luna, 4 Mich. J. Race & L. 39, 40-137 (1998)
Lobato v. Taylor, 71 P.3d 938 (Colo. 2002)
United States v. Platt, 730 F. Supp. 318 (D. Ariz. 1990)
Public Access Shoreline Hawaii v. Hawaii County Planning Commission Nansay Hawaii, 903 P.2d 1246 (Haw. 1995)
6.8. Covenants Running with the Land
Regency Homes Association v. Egermayer, 498 N.W.2d 783 (Neb. 1993)
6.9. Community's Interest in Charitable Trusts
In Re Milton Hershey School Trust (Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, Sept. 10, 2002)
7. Race, Ethnicity, And Culture In International And Comparative Property
7.1. Emerging Property Rights in International and Comparative Perspective: Traditional Knowledge
Bulun Bulun and Anor v. R & T Textiles Pty. Ltd., (1998) 157 A.L.R. 193 (Australia)
7.2. Reforming Property Distribution: Resolving Racial, Ethnic, and Social Inequities Through Land Allocation
7.2.1. Land Redistribution: The Social Function Doctrine
Constituic̀§ao Federal [Constitution] [C.F.] art. 182-85 (Braz.)
7.2.2. Land Reform in South Africa: Restitution, Redistribution, and Land Tenure Reform
Minister of Land Affairs of the Republic of S. Africa v. Slamdien, 1999 (1) BCLR 413, para 26 (LCC)
Port Elizabeth Municipality v. Various Occupiers, 2004 (12) BCLR 1268, 2006 SACLR LEXIS 25 (2004)
7.3. Protecting the Property Rights: Restitution in Post-Conflict Societies
7.3.1. Bosnia-Herzegovina
Human Rights Chamber of Bosnia and Herzegovina, "M.J." v. Republicka Srpska, Decision on Admissibility of Nov. 7, 1997, Case CH/96/28 (1997)
7.3.2. Guatemala
Friendly Settlement Agreement, Community of San Vicente Los Cimientos v. Guatemala, Case No. 11.197, Inter-Am C.H.R., Report No. 68/03, OEA/Ser. L/V/II.1 18 doc. 70 rev. 2 [¶] 36 (2003).