Holdings Information
Atiyah's accidents, compensation and the law / Peter Cane.
Bibliographic Record Display
-
Title:Atiyah's accidents, compensation and the law / Peter Cane.
-
Author/Creator:Cane, Peter, 1950-
-
Other Contributors/Collections:Atiyah, P. S.
-
Published/Created:Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2013.
-
Holdings
Holdings Record Display
-
Location:LAW LIBRARY (level 3)Where is this?
-
Call Number: KD1975 .A96 2013
-
Number of Items:1
-
Status:Available
-
Location:LAW LIBRARY (level 3)Where is this?
-
Library of Congress Subjects:Accident law--Great Britain.
Compensation (Law)--Great Britain.
-
Edition:8th ed.
-
Description:xxxiv, 508 p. ; 25 cm.
-
Series:Law in context.
-
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
-
ISBN:9781107636323 (pbk)
1107636329 (pbk)
9781107035423 (hardback)
1107035422 (hardback)
-
Contents:Machine generated contents note: pt. I issues in perspective
1. Introduction: surveying the field
1.1. Compensation for accidents
1.2. Natural and human causes
1.2.1. issue
1.2.2. Society's `responsibility' for human causes
1.2.3. Protecting reasonable expectations
1.2.4. Egalitarianism and the problem of drawing the line
1.3. Mixed systems in a mixed society
1.4. Some facts and figures
1.4.1. Accidents causing personal injury or death
1.4.2. Death and disability from other causes
1.4.3. prevalence of disability
1.4.4. effect of disability on income
1.4.5. Distribution and sources of compensation
1.4.6. more serious and the less serious
pt. II tort system in theory
2. Fault as a basis of liability
2.1. conceptual basis of tort law
2.2. Negligence as a basis of liability
2.3. fault principle
2.4. Negligence as fault
2.4.1. question of fact?
2.4.2. nature of negligence
2.4.3. Probability of harm
2.4.4. Likely magnitude of harm
2.4.5. value of the activity and the cost of the precautions needed to avoid harm
2.4.6. function of the negligence formula
2.4.7. Foreseeability
2.4.8. objective standard of care
2.4.9. Negligence in design and negligence in operation
2.5. Conduct of the claimant
2.5.1. Contributory negligence
2.5.2. Volenti non fit injuria
2.5.3. Illegality
3. scope of the tort of negligence
3.1. nature of the duty of care
3.2. Specific duty issues
3.2.1. Common situations in which duties of care have been imposed
3.2.2. distinction between acts and omissions
3.3. Nervous shock
3.4. Family claims
4. Departures from the fault principle
4.1. Fault liability and strict liability
4.2. `Procedural' devices
4.3. Breach of statutory duty
4.4. Contractual duties
4.5. Rylands v. Fletcher, nuisance and animals
4.6. Joint liability
4.7. Vicarious liability
4.8. Products liability
4.9. Proposals to extend strict liability
4.9.1. Dangerous things and activities
4.9.2. Railway accidents
4.10. Ex gratia compensation schemes
4.10.1. Vaccine damage
4.10.2. HIV and hepatitis-C
4.10.3. Variant CJD (Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease)
5. Causation and remoteness of damage
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Factual causation
5.2.1. Proving causation
5.2.2. Causing and increasing the risk of harm
5.2.3. Omissions
5.2.4. Multiple causal factors
5.3. Limits on the liability of factual causes
5.3.1. Legal causation
5.3.2. Damage not within the risk
5.3.3. Foreseeability again
5.4. Conclusion
6. Damages for personal injury and death
6.1. lump sum: predicting the future
6.1.1. Personal injury cases
6.1.2. Fatal cases
6.1.3. Variation of awards after trial
6.1.4. Suitability of lump sums
6.1.5. Alternatives to lump sums
6.2. Full compensation
6.2.1. Interest
6.2.2. Lost earnings and support
6.2.3. Medical and other expenses
6.3. Full compensation for lost `earnings': is it justified?
6.3.1. earnings-related principle
6.3.2. 100-per-cent principle
6.4. Full compensation: the commitment in practice
6.5. Intangible losses
6.5.1. Assessing intangible losses
6.5.2. tariff system
6.5.3. Subjective factors
6.5.4. Should damages be payable for intangible losses?
6.6. Overall maxima
6.7. Punitive damages
7. appraisal of the fault principle
7.1. compensation payable bears no relation to the degree of fault
7.2. compensation bears no relation to the means of the tortfeasor
7.3. harm-doer may be held legally liable without being morally culpable and vice versa
7.3.1. Collective liability
7.3.2. objective definition of fault
7.3.3. Moral culpability without legal liability
7.3.4. fault principle and popular morality
7.4. fault principle pays little attention to the conduct or needs of the victim
7.5. Justice may require payment of compensation without fault
7.6. Pragmatic objections to the fault principle
7.7. fault principle contributes to a culture of blaming and discourages people from taking responsibility for their own lives'
pt. III tort system in operation
8. Claims and claimants
8.1. Accident victims and tort claimants
8.1.1. Cases reaching trial and set down for trial
8.1.2. Actions commenced
8.1.3. Tort claims, actual and potential
8.2. Why do people (not) make tort claims?
8.2.1. Some research findings
8.2.2. Alternative remedies
8.2.3. Claims consciousness
8.3. Particular types of claims
8.3.1. Road accidents
8.3.2. Industrial injuries and illnesses
8.3.3. Public liability claims
8.3.4. Medical injuries
8.3.5. Group claims
9. Tortfeasors and insurers
9.1. Defendants
9.2. Individuals as tort defendants
9.3. Employers and corporations as tort defendants
9.4. Insurers
9.5. nature of liability insurance
9.6. Some problems of liability insurance
9.7. First-party insurance for the benefit of others
9.8. impact of liability insurance on the law
9.8.1. Statutory provisions
9.8.2. impact of insurance on the common law
9.9. Motor Insurers' Bureau
10. Settlements and trials
10.1. importance of settlements
10.2. Obtaining legal assistance and financing tort claims
10.3. course of negotiations
10.3.1. Individual claims
10.3.2. Group claims
10.4. When negotiations break down
10.5. time taken to achieve a settlement
10.6. amount of compensation
pt. IV Other compensation systems
11. First-party insurance
11.1. Types of first-party insurance
11.1.1. Injury and illness insurance
11.1.2. Legal expenses insurance
11.2. First-party injury and illness insurance compared with tort liability
12. Compensation for criminal injuries
12.1. Tort claims
12.2. Compensation orders
12.3. Other sources of compensation
12.4. Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme
12.4.1. Justifications for the CICS
12.4.2. scope of the CICS
12.4.3. Comparison between the CICS and tort liability
12.4.4. Administration
12.4.5. Claims consciousness
13. Social security system
13.1. Foundations of the social security system
13.1.1. Workers' compensation
13.1.2. National insurance
13.2. Beveridge Report and the 1946 Acts
13.3. Developments since 1946
13.4. Industrial injuries benefits
13.4.1. scope of the scheme
13.4.2. Accidents and diseases
13.4.3. Benefits
13.5. Benefits for the disabled generally
13.5.1. Statutory sick pay
13.5.2. Employment and support allowance
13.5.3. Personal independence payment
13.6. Other benefits
13.6.1. Carer's allowance
13.6.2. Bereavement benefits
13.6.3. Universal credit
13.7. Administration
13.8. tort system and the social security system compared
13.9. Overpayment, error and fraud
14. Other forms of assistance
14.1. general legal environment
14.2. taxation system
14.3. Social services
14.3.1. Employment
14.3.2. Mobility
14.3.3. Housing and residential accommodation
14.3.4. Other social services
14.4. Conclusion
pt. V overall picture
15. plethora of systems
15.1. concept of over-compensation
15.2. choice of compensation system
15.3. Subrogation and recoupment
15.4. Tort damages and other compensation
15.4.1. General principles
15.4.2. Tort damages and sick pay
15.4.3. Tort damages and personal insurance
15.4.4. Tort damages and charitable payments
15.4.5. Tort damages and social security benefits
15.5. Criminal injuries compensation
16. cost of compensation and who pays it
16.1. cost of tort compensation
16.2. Costs not paid through the tort system
16.2.1. cost of social services
16.2.2. cost of the social security system
16.2.3. Other sources of compensation
16.2.4. Costs in perspective
16.3. cost of criminal injuries compensation
17. functions of compensation systems
17.1. Compensation
17.1.1. Some preliminary questions
17.1.2. meaning of `compensation'
17.1.3. Assessing compensation systems
17.2. Distribution of losses
17.2.1. What should be distributed?
17.2.2. How should it be distributed?
17.3. allocation of risks
17.4. Punishment
17.5. Corrective justice
17.6. Vindication
17.7. Deterrence and prevention
17.7.1. Rules and standards of behaviour
17.7.2. Accident prevention via insurance
17.8. General deterrence
17.8.1. basic idea
17.8.2. Ascertaining the costs of an accident
17.8.3. Allocation of costs to activities
17.8.4. Responsiveness to price mechanism
17.8.5. Applying general deterrence criteria in practice
17.8.6. General deterrence and existing systems
17.8.7. Air assessment of this Value of the general deterrence approach
17.8.8. Conclusions about general deterrence
pt. VI future
18. Accident compensation in the twenty-first century
18.1. Where we are now and how we got here
18.2. Basic issues
18.2.1. Strict liability or no-fault?
18.2.2. Limited or comprehensive reform?
18.2.3. Preferential treatment
18.2.4. Assessment of compensation
18.2.5. Funding
18.2.6. Goals of the system
18.3. Proposals and schemes
Contents note continued: 18.3.1. Road accident schemes
18.3.2. Other schemes
18.4. way ahead
18.4.1. social welfare solution
18.4.2. private insurance solution
18.5. Damage to property
18.6. role of the insurance industry and the legal profession.